Begin with a fixed-price pilot on a single programme. When the output earns your trust, grow to department, school or university-wide — same engine, same human-approval discipline, lower cost per programme.
Every plan includes the human-in-the-loop approval workflow, signed submission bundles, and AI usage at fair use. Prices in GBP, excl. VAT.
Public bodies and consortia: ask about framework agreements. Not sure which fits? Start with the pilot — it credits toward your first annual plan.
| Item | Pilot | Department | School | University |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programmes | 1 | Up to 5 | Up to 20 | Unlimited |
| AoL cycles | 1 cycle | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Signed submission bundles | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Human-approval workflow | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Portfolio dashboards | — | Basic | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSO / data residency | — | — | On request | ✓ |
| Support | Priority email | Priority + contact | Dedicated + SLA | |
| AI usage costs | Included | Fair use | Fair use | Negotiated |
Accreditation teams typically spend several staff-weeks per year compiling AoL evidence — or £10–50k on external consultants. One fixed-price cycle lets you verify the output quality on your own data, with your own faculty in the approval loop, before any annual commitment. If the bundle doesn't stand up to your scrutiny, you've spent £2,500 and two weeks — not a consulting budget and a semester.
Atomic AoL's 41-agent engine separates what a standard requires from how the evidence is gathered and written. Today it runs AACSB Standard 5 end-to-end, in production. The same architecture is being extended to other quality frameworks — EQUIS, AMBA and ANVUR are on the roadmap. We'll tell you honestly what's live today versus what's coming, so you never buy a promise. See how it works →
Tell us about your programme and your AACSB timeline — we'll reply with a concrete pilot plan within two working days.
Contact us → Book a call →