Atomic AoL logo Atomic AoL Accreditation & AssuranceOfLearning · a project by Marino&Carli
Live demo · single programme

See a real AoL output before you talk to us.

This is an actual AACSB Standard 5 Assurance of Learning report, generated end-to-end by the 41-agent pipeline — from raw grades and surveys to a signed submission bundle. The data is synthetic (Hogwarts Business School), the workflow is the real thing.

🧪 Synthetic demonstration. Programme, students and results below are fictional (Hogwarts Business School · MBA). No real institution's data is shown. Your pilot runs on your data, in an isolated tenant.
AACSB Standard 5 · Assurance of Learning
Hogwarts Business School — MBA (Full-time)
Cycle 2022/23–2024/25 · generated in 00:13 · ~£0.08
1 · Programme & scope
Programme: MBA (Full-time)
Accreditation standard: AACSB 2020 · Standard 5
Cohorts analysed: 9 (3 years × 3 sections)
Students in scope: 274 across 4 core modules
2 · Competency goal under review

CG-1 — Apply quantitative reasoning to business decisions. Mapped to 4 core modules (501 Financial Analysis, 502 Operations, 503 Data & Decisions, 504 Economics). Measured directly via assessed module performance and indirectly via exit, employer and alumni surveys.

3 · Direct measures — assessed performance
Module2022/232023/242024/25Trend
501 · Financial Analysis85.2% pass89.2%93.2%▲ +8.0pp
502 · Operations87.2%90.2%93.2%▲ +6.0pp
503 · Data & Decisions92.2%93.2%95.2%▲ +3.0pp
504 · Economics87.2%89.2%92.2%▲ +5.0pp

Pass rate = share meeting the 70% competency threshold, weighted by cohort size (n=274). Benchmark target: 85%.

4 · Indirect measures — stakeholder surveys
SourceRating (0–1)RespondentsPrivacy floor
Exit survey0.7064✓ n≥5
Employer feedback0.6328✓ n≥5
Alumni follow-up0.7541✓ n≥5
5 · Finding (drafted by agent, approved by faculty)
Quantitative-reasoning attainment improved consistently across all four core modules over three cycles (+3 to +8 percentage points), with 2024/25 cohorts clearing the 85% benchmark on every module. Direct evidence and exit-survey self-assessment align; employer feedback (0.63) lags student and alumni perception — flagged as the priority gap for the next "closing the loop" action. Recommended action: add an applied employer-set capstone brief to Module 502 and re-measure in 2025/26.
6 · Human-in-the-loop approval trail
Competency goals confirmed Programme Director · 2026-05-21 09:14
Benchmark threshold (85%) approved AoL Committee · 2026-05-21 10:02
Finding & recommended action signed off Associate Dean · 2026-05-22 16:40
7 · Signed submission bundle

Three-part, cryptographically chained. Any auditor can re-hash the PDF and verify it against the manifest line by line.

aacsb_standard_version: "Standard-5-2020"
programme: "MBA (Full-time)"
cg_count: 1   direct_aggregates_count: 12   indirect_measures_count: 3
evidence_count: 28   benchmark_count: 4
pdf_sha256: "820f9e155af36700c51bb4e99852591931c494675b71f1b1527f5c4c9dc24cff"
bundle_sha256: "a91c…verified"   generated_at: "2026-05-23T11:28:59Z"

That took 13 seconds on synthetic data.

On your real programme, a full cycle runs in about 30 minutes — and your faculty approves every judgement that matters. Start with one programme, fixed price.

See pricing → Book a call →